1. Some people are poisonous, some people are venomous. Both are danger, but each are different.


2. I love Challies’ mooshy posts about his wife. 18 Things I Will Not Regret Doing With My Wife (and also 18 Things… My Kids)


3. Stu gives us some language for talking about different kinds of preaching gifts, without implying one kind of preacher is ‘better’ than another: convention preacher vs congregation preacher.


4. Dave Moore rightly disagrees that gospel workers must have secular work experience to be good ministers.


5. Haha: one more Challies gooey post about his wife. This one is lovely - “She strengthens me”.


6. Are you able to contribute a small amount to our mission work on campus at UTAS? We are currently running a fundraising drive.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-20th-december-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

In this great session from Andrew Heard with the FIEC in the UK, he pulls apart the way we sentimentalise biblical metaphors for church and ministry.

We think shepherd/pastor involves a gentle, cuddly, counselling model of ministry. But in the Bible the shepherd was the ruler, leader, protector of his flock.

And we think the family metaphor implies the small, casual, informal Western nuclear family of a couple with 2 kids. But what of the family with 9 children? Such a family needs to be highly regimented and organised, with good routines and delegation in place. And yet it is not somehow less a family for that.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/dont-sentimentalise-biblical-metaphors-for-church-and-ministry (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Modern evangelical theo-psychology has over-defined idols in a way that doesn’t make sense of historical idolatry or human sin. Take for example Keller’s definition from Counterfeit Gods:

What is an idol? It is anything more important to you than God, anything that absorbs your heart and imagination more than God, anything you seek to give you what only God can give

Just as Calvin said the human nature is heart is a perpetual factory of idols, so modern evangelical pop-psychology is a factory of idol-talk. And I think it’s run away from itself. Ten years ago sin was wrongly defined as fundamentally ‘selfishness’. Now it defined as fundamentally ‘idolatry’. Both are inaccurate.

In the first place, idolatry is first bad because it is a sin of false religion. Religious idolatry is wicked, even if there is no emotional engagement with it. It is wicked to perform acts of worship to a false god, even if I don’t especially care about that god. I worry that in leaving the literal definition of idolatry in favour of metaphorical psychologising, we will stop rebuking literal idolatry.

But more than this, idols are PLURAL in the Bible. Idolatry is not monotheistic. To look to one God to be at the centre of our life and consume our hopes, desires and service is a monotheistic thing. Idols did not demand that exclusive service in ancient paganism. Idolatry does not demand the kind of monotheistic worship.

Indeed idolatry can be quite emotionally distant. I don’t need to be all-absorbed by the idol. I USE the idol. Give the sacrifice in order to get a benefit. Idolatry is more pragmatic than monotheism.

In the Old Testament, idolatry is compared the the adultery of sleeping around, not the modern adultery of falling in love with a mistress. idolatry is not finding a ‘new wife’ in a false god, but running after petty pleasures from multiple partners. So do we turn aside form God and find another idol to meet all those needs? Maybe. Or maybe we drift from fix to fix, in a series of idolatrous one-night-stands.

Now you COULD say that this is because there is an underlying ‘heart-idol’ that leads us to restlessly run from thing to thing. But at this point I wonder whether we’ve left biblical talk about idolatry behind and invented a whole new layer of evangeli-psychology. Is ‘idol’ the right category for this underlying evil drive. Or is the word for that just ‘sin’?

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/an-idol-isnt-an-all-consuming-object-of-worship (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

I wrote this post yesterday and it has disappeared. Let’s hope it works this time.

So your non-Christian friend asks you about same-sex marriage. You take Peter Jensen’s advice to heart: this might be your only opportunity to talk about the gospel with them: what are you going to say?

Well after quickly talking about your belief in objective, biological gender difference and the legitimacy of basing sexual ethics on biological gender and procreation (Part 1) ... what are avenues to talking about the gospel?

1. Objective gender and the gospel: unity in diversity

I think the best one with regard to gender diversity is to talk about how Christian theology as a whole holds together unity and diversity on many levels. We don’t believe in a fragmented universe. Nor do we believe that things will ultimately all merge onto a single unity. We believe in a diverse but unified reality.

It’s interesting that some religious and spiritual views that believe in an ultimate One, use trasvesticism and homosexuality in their religious practice as a way of blurring distinctions and so moving back to the one.

God himself is three persons in one essence. He made the world, not an emanation from himself, but a free and distinct creation out of nothing. That creation has many different parts two it but is one creation. Humanity were made male and female but were to unite together as one flesh. The hope of heaven is also to be brought under one head, Christ, but still to remain a distinct new creation.

So gender difference is not a problem that must be fixed by trying to create an undifferentiated androgynous humanity. It actually reflects something of the nature of God, his world and his plans for salvation.

2. Heterosexuality and the gospel: diversity, affection, intimacy, faithfulness and fruitfulness

Heterosexual sexuality provides a picture of the covenant love of God in a unique way, that homosexual relationships cannot: the diversity-in-unity of male and female, the affection, the intimacy, the covenant faithfulness, and the potential for creative fruitfulness in child bearing.

A homosexual relationship might express the affection, intimacy and faithfulness, but it cannot show the diversity-in-unity in the same way, nor naturally show the creative overflow of love in childbearing.

In celebrating the unique two-become one, affectionate, faithful, intimate and fruitful relationship of marriage we can show how it is a unique picture of Christ and the church.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/seizing-the-gospel-opportunity-of-a-conversation-about-same-sex-marriage-2 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Yesterday at Multiply13, I launched the 3rd Geneva Push website redesign. The site now highlights more than ever its role as a warehouse of resources. The design is more bright and friendly, rather than grungy and the website itself is ‘responsive’ - so it looks/behaves like an app when viewed on your phone or tablet.

We have also a pretty new promo video*:

Our vision for Australia from Geneva Push on Vimeo.

*Fun fact: the girl I’m talking to the video is my younger sister Alice.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/new-geneva-responsive-site-and-new-geneva-promo-vid (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Rather than measure attendance on a Sunday or membership role, measure how many people are actively engaged in the ministry of the church:

• Workers serving in ongoing roles


• Leaders owning that role, training for it and seeking to involve others.


• A leader of leaders who recruits, trains and overseers leaders to work with him or her.

Do you have leaders and LEADERS or leaders who are not on the paid staff of your church?

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/what-do-you-measure-attendance-or-service (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

From Ed Stetzer:

1. Pastor (may need an administrator - every church needs one person who is administratively gifted)


2. Music leader: gain a Western cultural ‘need’ to have a devoted music leader.


3. Preschool/children’s leader


4. Assimilation coordinator: a dogged determination to not let anyone fall through the cracks. Not just ‘be my friend’, but ‘join my church’.


5. Outreach networker.


6. Spiritual gifts mobiliser: help people to discover and deploy their gifts.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/key-leaders-need-to-help-churches-grow (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Listening to Ed Stetzer on breaking growth barriers in new churches. He quoted Darryn Patrick:

Largely because most pastors don’t know how to build systems, structures, and processes that are not contingent upon them. Most pastors can care for people, but don’t build systems of care. Most pastors can develop leaders individually, but lack the skill to implement a process of leadership development. When a pastor can’t build systems and structures that support ministry, the only people who are cared for or empowered to lead are those who are “near” the pastor or those very close to the pastor. This limits the size of the church to the size of the pastor.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/why-many-churches-struggle-to-grow (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

It’s a queer little phrase in Hebrews 9:14:

How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!

God made the world when the Father through the Spirit spoke the world into being. Or again, the Father sends the Spirit to apply the work of Christ to us. And in prayer we approach the Father in Christ’s name by the Holy Spirit.

But how does the atonement ITSELF work out from a trinitarian point of view? Hebrews 9:14 is the only passage I can think of that explicitly includes the Holy Spirit in the mix. This makes it a little harder to know exactly what Hebrews 9:14 is describing. Here are some thoughts:

1. God the Holy Spirit seals and anoints Christ as an acceptable sacrifice.


2. God the Holy Spirit empowered God the Son in his incarnate act of obedient self sacrifice.


3. God the Holy Spirit operated as the effectual administrator of the atonement as it took place: he was active in the ‘making him as sin who knew no sin’.

Keen to hear you response to my suggestions, as well as suggestions of your own. Also keen to hear of other passages in Scripture that address this question.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/jesus-offered-himself-through-the-spirit-on-the-cross (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. We can demonise the past or sentimentalise the past. These photos help us see the past as the same as the present: ordinary people.


2. Rhys Muldoon is one of my favourite kids entertainers (I could never bear the Wiggles: ugh!). In this article from the Age, he talks about his negative experience of going to Hillsong.


3. Nikki and I are big fans of Alain de Boton. But his ‘religion for atheists’ thing is fascinatingly pathetic. It’s kind of like ‘romance for singles’. Anyway, in this post, Dan Anderson critiques the de Boton.


4. Simone Richardson has been posting some really insightful stuff about pastors, assistant pastors, conflict and personality types:
   
   
   
   • The ESTJ minister
   
   
   • The ENFP minister
   
   
   • Staffing issues at church: why senior ministers have conflicts with assistant ministers.
   
   
   
   


5. Lists of ‘how technology has ruined life’ are generally tiresome: they blame technology for human disorganisation or sin and they sentimentalise technology and culture of a previous era (see point 1 in this edition of Mirrors!). But there’s some nice ideas in this list, to plan some time for in the New Year.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-29th-november-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. Plan and prepare how much of the illustration you will quote verbatim, and how much you will paraphrase. It is easier to listen to if you only quote the most necessary bits, and fill in the gaps in your own words.


2. Take the time to get the relevant facts straight. Figure out the name of the person who won Survivor. Get the date correct. Or whatever.


3. Is it dense language or a complex story? Which parts do you need to slow down or repeat? Which bits need a brief explanatory aside?


4. Figure out what it is about the illustration that attracted you to it, and make sure you make that bit come alive: is it the key word you need to memorise? The dramatic pause before the reveal? One particularly crisp turn of phrase?


5. Perhaps ‘preach’ or ‘expound’ the illustration a little - unpack its power, weave it back into the point you are making in your sermon.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/sermon-illustrations-part-6-how-to-deliver-illustrations (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

To implement the 5Ms, or almost any other ministry model, you need to start building an organisational structure to your ministry and you need to establish teams. If this structure is going to stay standing and these teams are going to stay functional, you are going to have to start managing/bishopping.

It is a big turning point in a ministry’s life when it breaks out of the single leader’s personal (dis)organisational system. When the ministry is no longer largely controlled by your desktop, your diary, your calendar, your control - it is free to spread and expand. Responsibility is more like information than money: it spreads and increases, rather than simply changing hands.

How can you make the change:

• From one central control (the pastor, the eldership, the steering committee) of all actions, projects, ideas and decisions to multiple centres of control, where the centre provides a high-level oversight?


• From managing every job by a roster (based on duty - everyone taking turns), to giving over areas of responsibility to teams (based on vision and belonging - everyone having a unique part to play)?


• From a cloud of random ministries, jobs and roles largely driven by tradition or by being reactive and largely organised based on who-knows-who to a clear overall ministry structure, that gets built and streamlined?


• From either micromanaging or abdicating to managing in ways that provides direction, accountability, alignment, urgency, coaching and support?

And in keeping with the rest of this series. If you can’t figure out how to administer and oversee teams and organisational structure, your 5Ms attempt will most likely be dead in the water.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/dissecting-the-5ms-part-3-org-charts-teams-and-management (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. Store them separately from the sermon in which you first used them. You want to be able to find the illustration easily, without having to remember which sermon you used it in!


2. File in as simple an A-Z filing system as possible. That limits the number of levels in which something can be hidden. Harder to find things once they are three-layers deep in a file-folder structure.


3. Don’t bother saving them. Just let Google store them for you. For many illustrations it’s probably easier to find the quote again by googling, than by searching your own file system!


4. Own the fact that like with all filing, you may only use 5% of your illustrations again. You are storing everything because you don’t know which 5% you’ll use again! Regular reviewing and purging will help keep it under control.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/sermon-illustrations-part-5-how-to-store-illustrations (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. My church has been doing a kind of pre-evangelism/diaconal ministry, running ‘open forums’ on issues where people in our community need help, support and advice. We have done ‘marriage’ and ‘parenting’ and just recently I participated in a panel on ‘building better staff’ at a small business event. You can listen to the audio here. These events have been run exceptionally well and the content has been great too. They are a great way to give friends/acquaintances/colleagues a first-contact with the church.


2. Steve Kruyger puts into words what I’ve been thinking for a long time: 5 reasons not to provide a feedback form at an event.


3. Kevin de Young challenges preachers to ask of their next sermon: “Can I make my best point–the one I’m most excited about, the one I can’t wait to deliver–without noting anything from this week’s passage?”


4. Dave Moore advises us to answer questions with statements (that is, actually answer the question) and statements with questions (that is, try to figure out why someone wanted to make the comment they made).


5. I know we talk a lot about ‘mummy guilt’ but I can definitely relate to Challies post about ‘daddy guilt’. I often get ‘Cat’s in the Cradle’ (the superior Ugly Kid Joe version) playing in my head, when I really don’t have the power to go out and play soccer at 6:30pm at night:
   

   I don’t think I failed the family. The simple fact is that I need rest. With the march of age and the weight of responsibility, Aileen and I need it more than the children do. I believe I served them better by taking a few days to not rush around, to not expend a lot of effort and energy, but instead to enjoy deep rest. I believe I can serve my family better now that I have experienced this rest.

   
   


6. Sam Rainer reminds us that if a church is health and growing then it will be messy!

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-15th-november-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. Everyday experience. Creative writing workshops always urgent writers to carry a pen and paper with them everywhere, to help them be alert to potential material wherever they go, and be ready to capture it.


2. Drawing out the content in the passage you are preaching on.


3. Other parts of the Bible.


4. Faux-etymologies: ‘dunamis’ is the word from which we get ‘dynamite’ from. This is poor exegesis but makes for colourful illustration. As long as you are clear that you are not doing exegesis.


5. From current events.


6. From literature, songs, movies or pop culture.


7. Nature and science.


8. History.


9. Popular level Christian books - often they are really just sermons turned into book form, so they have good illustrations.


10. Dictionaries of quotations.


11. Sermon illustrations websites.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/sermon-illustrations-part-4-where-to-find-illustrations (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. Greek scholars admit to inventing Ancient Greece. This funny spoof is a great way of exposing how silly a lot of the Jesus myth conspiracy theory stuff that gets trotted out. Did you see that latest one? New evidence ‘Roman creed’ that demonstrates that the Romans invented Jesus… what was the ‘new evidence’? The Works of Josephus!?! Sigh.


2. Challies interviews John MacArthur about the anti-charismatic ‘Strange Fire’ conference. MacArthur says some sensible stuff, including answers to people who say that he should’ve had more ‘forums’ and ‘heard from both sides’:
   

   Our decision not to host a debate at the Strange Fire Conference was intentional. Debates are rarely effective in truly helping people think carefully through the issues, since they can easily be reduced to sound bites and talking points. By contrast, a clear understanding of biblical truth comes from a faithful study of the Scriptures. Our hope is that the conference sparked a renewed desire for that kind diligent study on this important issue. I also expect continuationists to respond in writing to the things I have written in the book. I welcome that kind of interchange. It allows people to think carefully, over a prolonged period of time, about the arguments on both sides of the issue. It has always been through the written word that theological disputes like this have been grappled with in church history. That requires the kind of devotion and effort that brings serious discussion to the fore. I have taken those pains in Strange Fire, and would hope that others would interact on that same level.

   
   


3. Simone shares a new theory on different kinds of expository preaching that suit different temperaments of people. I think she’s onto something.


4. An interview on the Harvard Business Review Ideacast that states the obvious: working fathers struggle with work-life balance as much as working mothers. Along the way it makes the observation that white-collar men sometimes transfer machismo to working long hours, instead of having big muscles and being able to fight fires. It also reminds us that the idea of man going ‘off to work’ and leaving woman ‘at home’ as a relatively recent construct.


5. How a late-person thinks. I posted this on my Facebook and it caused a comment flame war. Seems that early-people don’t have a sense of humour after all :-P It’s a silly little article, but I think it captures the outlook of the late-person. These differences do exist, even if you work on them. I have disciplined myself to become punctual. And yet I am STILL more likely to be mildly late, in contrast to an ‘early person’.


6. I recently preached on guidance and decision making at our final ‘Citywide Gathering’ for the year.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-8th-november-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

When you study Greek at Bible College, you have to learn the dozen ways in which a genitive can be used: the possessive genitive, the genitive of apposition, the subjective or object genitive, the partitive genitive and so on. And within each of these categories there are finer differences.

But it seems that often in conversation with ministers this subtlety gets lost. There are many ways of using the genitive. Indeed there are many ways of just using a possessive pronoun ‘mine’, ‘our’. However piety and politics won’t have it:

The pedantry of piety: It’s not YOUR church, it’s JESUS’ church

Sure it’s a good rhetorical line. And talking often about ‘my church’ MAY betray a deeper presumption and pride.

But talking about ‘my church’ may well just be a way of saying ‘the church I fellowship with’, ‘the church where I minister’. There’s nothing theologically suspect or dishonouring to Jesus in that construction.

The pedantry of politics: They’re not YOUR churches, they’re OUR churches

Sometimes parachurch networks, like MTS or Geneva will get pulled up by denominational leaders: ‘Stop talking about YOUR churches, they say. These are not ‘MTS churches’ these are ANGLICAN (Presbyterian/Baptist/foo) churches.’

Of course on the level constitutional precision this is correct. And it MAY be responding to a legitimate quasi-anti-denominationalism. (Of course it MAY ALSO betray a territorial spirit in the heart of the denominational leader - perhaps we need to get a bit pious and remember: they’re JESUS’ churches!)

But talking about ‘our churches’ may also merely be another way of saying ‘the churches affiliated with our network.’

It is possible for the same church to be Jesus’ church, my church, a Baptist church AND an MTS church.

NEXT WEEK: the pedantry and piety of datives…

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/not-your-churches-the-pedantry-of-piety-and-politics (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. When they need explaining!


2. When they leave people wondering: ‘What happened next?’ or ‘Is that accurate?’


3. When they clash: with your personality or the culture of the congregation. If you come across as proud, or the illustration seems in bad taste, if they don’t fit your personality, if they don’t with with the knowledge and interest of your hearers, if they are inaccurate or inauthentic.


4. If they overtake the sermon: too funny, too emotional powerful, too long.


5. If they include a theological distortion.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/sermon-illustrations-part-3-why-illustrations-fail (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

1. Steve Kruyger gives a 3 examples of how churches figure out what things to advertise the most.


2. Did you hear about the John Macarthur anti-charismatic conference? A big hoo-ha in the USA, but a slightly different scene to here in Australia. This post, from Kevin DeYoung, clarifies how the Puritans would be BOTH ‘cessationists’ in one sense (WCF 1.1: ” those former ways of God’s revealing his will unto his people being now ceased.”), and yet also have a place for ongoing ‘secondary’ kinds of revelation:
   

   A detailed analysis of the writings of the Westminster divines reveals that these churchmen possessed both a strong desire to maintain the unity of Word and Spirit and a concern to safeguard the freedom of the Holy Spirit to speak to particular circumstances through the language and principles of Scripture. God still enabled predictive prophecy and spoke to individuals in extraordinary ways, but contemporary prophecy was held to be something different from the extraordinary prophecy of New Testament figures. In the minds of the Scottish Presbyterians and English Puritans, prophecy was considered to be an application of Scripture for a specific situation, not an announcement of new information not contained within the Bible. The Scripture always remained essential for the process of discerning God’s will.

   
   


3. Steve Kruyger has picked out some highlights from Kevin DeYoung’s book ‘Crazy Busy’. I liked these ones:
   

   We’re not actually in danger of working too hard. We simply work hard at things in the wrong proportions. If you work eighty hours a week and never see your kids and never talk to your wife, people may call you a workaholic. And no doubt you’re putting a lot of effort into your career. But you may not be working very hard at being a dad or being a husband or being a man after God’s own heart.

   
   And:
   

   Stewarding my time is not about selfishly pursuing only the things I like to do. It’s about effectively serving others in the ways I’m best able to serve and in the ways I am most uniquely called to serve…“Unseized” time tends to flow toward our weakness, get swallowed up by dominant people, and surrender to the demands of emergencies. So unless God intends for us to serve only the loudest, neediest, most intimidating people, we need to plan ahead, set priorities, and serve more wisely so that we might serve more effectively.

   
   


4. Simone gives a rich analysis of reasons for conflict between a senior minister and an assistant minister. She manages to tackle it without attacking one side or the other. She also recognises the unique nature of ministry, rather than just blaming ministers for being petty or unprofessional. And best of all she gives great concrete advice, too! Thanks Simone!

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-1st-november-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

One of the most bizarre discoveries for people is that Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York City has paid non-Christian musicians to play music in their church services.

Most Australians I know really balk at this. It feels unspiritual. Mercenary. Selling out on the community of God’s people for the sake of quality. No only to have non-Christians… but to PAY them!?

I remember somewhere reading Tim Keller make a peculiar theological argument for how this was fulfilling in part the Old Testament prophecies about the Gentiles singing praises to the Lord. I read those prophecies as being fulfilled when the Gentiles come to put their hope the Lord.

BUT

I think there is a much more simple, historical justification: accompanying music is not that big a deal. Our conviction that the musicians must be Christian, it seems to me, is in part the fruit of the modern ‘worship’ movement.

It is not a big deal for an old traditional church to pay an organist to come in and play the organ for their services. Because it’s just a backing instrument. The congregational singing is the big thing. We might pay a non-Christian gardener or a non-Christian accountant. Why not a non-Christian backing musician?

It is in part that we have over-spiritualised and over-centralised the role of band in our church services that we find it strange to have non-Christians in the band and to pay them to do it.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/its-ok-to-pay-non-christians-to-play-music-in-church-services (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Rather than measure attendance on a Sunday or membership role, measure how many people are actively engaged in the ministry of the church:

• Workers serving in ongoing roles


• Leaders owning that role, training for it and seeking to involve others.


• A leader of leaders who recruits, trains and overseers leaders to work with him or her.

Do you have leaders and LEADERS or leaders who are not on the paid staff of your church?

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/what-do-you-measure-attendance-or-service (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

From Ed Stetzer:

1. Pastor (may need an administrator - every church needs one person who is administratively gifted)


2. Music leader: gain a Western cultural ‘need’ to have a devoted music leader.


3. Preschool/children’s leader


4. Assimilation coordinator: a dogged determination to not let anyone fall through the cracks. Not just ‘be my friend’, but ‘join my church’.


5. Outreach networker.


6. Spiritual gifts mobiliser: help people to discover and deploy their gifts.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/key-leaders-need-to-help-churches-grow (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Listening to Ed Stetzer on breaking growth barriers in new churches. He quoted Darryn Patrick:

Largely because most pastors don’t know how to build systems, structures, and processes that are not contingent upon them. Most pastors can care for people, but don’t build systems of care. Most pastors can develop leaders individually, but lack the skill to implement a process of leadership development. When a pastor can’t build systems and structures that support ministry, the only people who are cared for or empowered to lead are those who are “near” the pastor or those very close to the pastor. This limits the size of the church to the size of the pastor.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/why-many-churches-struggle-to-grow (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

It’s a queer little phrase in Hebrews 9:14:

How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!

God made the world when the Father through the Spirit spoke the world into being. Or again, the Father sends the Spirit to apply the work of Christ to us. And in prayer we approach the Father in Christ’s name by the Holy Spirit.

But how does the atonement ITSELF work out from a trinitarian point of view? Hebrews 9:14 is the only passage I can think of that explicitly includes the Holy Spirit in the mix. This makes it a little harder to know exactly what Hebrews 9:14 is describing. Here are some thoughts:

1. God the Holy Spirit seals and anoints Christ as an acceptable sacrifice.


2. God the Holy Spirit empowered God the Son in his incarnate act of obedient self sacrifice.


3. God the Holy Spirit operated as the effectual administrator of the atonement as it took place: he was active in the ‘making him as sin who knew no sin’.

Keen to hear you response to my suggestions, as well as suggestions of your own. Also keen to hear of other passages in Scripture that address this question.

via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/jesus-offered-himself-through-the-spirit-on-the-cross (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)