Corporations shouldn’t excuse bad behvaiour by saying their first duty is to shareholders

I think it’s a shameful and swaggering when corporations say that they can’t be ethical because their first responsibility is to their shareholders. Rubbish.


The shareholders are investing in the company (or they ought to be) to gain a profit AS they help the company fulfill it’s mission.


I like the Johnson & Johnson ‘Credo’ statement that begins:



We believe our first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses and patients, to mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services. In meeting their needs everything we do must be of high quality. We must constantly struve to reduce our costs in order to maintain reasonable prices. Customers’ orders must be serviced promptly and accurately. Our suppliers and distributors must have an opportunity to make a fair profit.



And ends:



Our final responsibility is to our stockhodlers. Businesses must make a sound profit. We must experiment with new ideas. Research must be carried on, innovative programs developed and mistakes paid for. New equipment must be purchased, new facilities provided and new products launched. Reserves must be created to provide for advserse times. When we operate according to these principles, the stockholders should realize a fair return.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/corporations-ant-excuse-bad-behvaiour-by-saying-their-first-duty-is-to-shar (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Thoughts on the DiSC Profile 4: Thoughts on ‘C’

I’m now at the last of the four basic DiSC ‘types’ and will know have made enemies with all of you. :-)



  1. It might be helpful to realise that C’s feel strongly and personally about being right and accurate. They are not just being fussy or pedantic. They genuinely feel strongly about correctness and feel distressed by sloppiness. And they sincerely want to help by pointing out when something is in error. This might help you be more considerate and sympathetic.

  2. C’s can tend to be more deadpan in their interactions, and so encouragements to smile and laugh speak in an animated manner will help them in build bridges with others. this is especially important if they are in ‘constructive criticism’ mode - they need to be gentle and friendly when they disagree.

  3. C’s resent being dumped with the details if those ‘delegating’ don’t show interest or respect for this important work. However if you pay attention to their updates and demonstrate that you value their details work, they will happily take it off your plate.

  4. Like D’s, C’s prefer concrete and to the point email communication. Unlike D’s, they not only want the bottom line, but also the bullet points and attachments.

  5. Coach C’s to realise that for them to truly get something ‘right’ it needs to be not only at top quality, but also on time, on budget and according to its original purpose. Something is no longer ‘perfect’ if it’s three weeks late!

  6. Help them assess teams, projects and circumstances based on the people and relationships, not just the facts and goals.

  7. C’s need concrete and precise instructions wherever possible. Giving them broad, abstract guidance or feedback about the ‘vibe’ won’t be helpful but rather paralysing or frustrating.

  8. C’s value you doing thing in the right process and through the proper channels. It is a way of showing respect.

  9. C’s can be great at giving constructive criticism, proposals, assessments and surveys. They tend to not be so good at vision setting.

  10. Coach a C to communicate while they’re thinking. Even saying things like ‘let me think about that’ or even just grunt and hmph, so that people don’t have to just wait for your cogs to turn!






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/thoughts-on-the-disc-profile-4-thoughts-on-c (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

One church but multiple congregations?

What are the theological implications of having one church with multiple congregations? If a church is the gathering of God’s people - how can you rightly call a multi-congregational church a church? Isn’t it really a group of churches? This raises important issues about the identity of a church and the proper extent of authority over the church.


Here are 6 possible ways of thinking about the matter:



  1. Be very strong on the congregationalist view of church, and refuse to separate church identity and scope of authority beyond a single congregation that gathers weekly. Once it stops gathering weekly, it should not be called church. More: once it stops gathering weekly, it is inappropriate for a single leadership to presume to govern it: this is latent episcopacy. This is the 9 Marks view. They did a 9 Marks Journal edition all about Multi-Site churches that addresses this.

  2. Multiply services, but deliberately find ways to genuinely express the identity of these multiple services as a single gathering: this would mean you work hard at having combined services, say once a quarter, not simply as a matter of pragmatics… but as a matter of principle. (this is the outcome I’d favour).

  3. Put the services on a long-term trajectory for becoming separate and independent churches: this, I gather, it the Mars Hill strategy. They have a network of Mars Hill churches for now, but are prepared to divide them off to become independent after Driscoll dies.

  4. Free your definition of church from necessary gathering as one entire community or having a completely separate leadership. In this case you are arguing that there is enough elasticity in the definition of ‘church’ that a church with multiple non-overlapping services is still a single church. This is similar to Option 6 (below), but doesn’t argue that we are necessarily dealing with multiple churches. I think Don Carson is kind of arguing on these lines in his lectures on Basic Baptist Beliefs (and again in this transcript) - he says, for example that the ‘church in Ephesus’ was in fact multiple house churches with a single leadership that was still considered ‘the church’ in that city. The question here is at what point does this stretch the definition of ‘church’ beyond all recognition? A church with congregations in cities across the world?

  5. Recognise that you really have are multiple churches sharing common resources, but build in careful guidelines to preserve genuine cooperation. This view sees there being problems independent churches giving up too much of their identity and authority to a ‘share coop’ of leadership/financial management. And so it allows this partnership but carefully describes how this relationship works and how individual congregations can cede from this partnership if and when they choose. This also preserves formal, governing representative leadership among the congregations, undermining the control of the senior leader of the network.

  6. Recognise that what you really have are multiple churches sharing common resources and leadership and insist that there’s nothing wrong with that. This is Phillip Jensen’s view. You can read/listen to a series on the Biblical Church that Phillip did at the Cathedral in 2005 that argues along these lines. This might betray a latent Hooker Principle (as opposed to Regulative Principle) in Anglicanism.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/one-church-but-multiple-congregations (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Spurgeon on suspicion in ministry

From Lectures to My Students on Preaching. It’s an annoyingly long quote, but I just couldn’t resist it.


There are so many good lines (a suspicious minister is like a spider: “There he sits in the center, a mass of sensation, all nerves and raw wounds, excitable and excited, a self-immolated martyr drawing the blazing faggots about him, and apparently anxious to be burned”; a minister anxious to get feedback on his sermon “seeking compliments like little children when dressed in new clothes, who say, “See my pretty frock.””!).


Even if you only read a paragraph or two, you will be both wonderfully amused and deeply challenged:



Avoid with your whole soul that spirit of suspicion which sours some men’s lives, and to all things from which you might harshly draw an unkind inference turn a blind eye and a deaf ear. Suspicion makes a man a torment to himself and a spy towards others. Once begin to suspect, and causes for distrust will multiply around you, and your very suspiciousness will create the major part of them. Many a friend has been transformed into an enemy by being suspected. Do not, therefore, look about you with the eyes of mistrust, nor listen as an caves-dropper with the quick ear of fear.


To go about the congregation ferreting out disaffection, like a gamekeeper after rabbits, is a mean employment, and is generally rewarded most sorrowfully. Lord Bacon wisely advises “the provident Stay of inquiry of that which we would be loath to find.” When nothing is to be discovered which will help us to love others we had better cease from the inquiry, for we may drag to light that which may be the commencement of years of contention. I am not, of course referring to cases requiring discipline which must be thoroughly investigated and boldly dealt with, but I have upon my mind mere personal matters where the main sufferer is yourself; here it is always best not to know, nor to wish to know, what is being said about you, either by friends or foes. Those who praise us are probably as much mistaken as those who abuse us, and the one may be regarded as a set off to the other, if indeed it be worth while taking any account at all of man’s judgment. If we have the approbation of our God, certified by a placid conscience, we can afford to be indifferent to the opinions of our fellow men, whether they commend or condemn. If we cannot reach this point we are babes and not men.


Some are childishly anxious to know their friend’s opinion of them, and if it contain the smallest element of dissent or censure, they regard him as an enemy forthwith. Surely we are not popes, and do not wish our hearers to regard us as infallible l We have known men become quite enraged at a perfectly fair and reasonable remark, and regard an honest friend as an opponent who delighted to find fault; this misrepresentation on the one side has soon produced heat on the other, and strife has ensued. How much better is gentle forbearance! You must be able to bear criticism, or you are not fit to be at the head of a congregation; and you must let the critic go without reckoning him among your deadly foes, or you will prove yourself a mere weakling. It is wisest always to show double kindness where you have been severely handled by one who

thought it his duty to do so, for he is probably an honest man and worth winning. He who in your early days hardly thinks you fit for the pastorate may yet become your firmest defender if he sees that you grow in grace, and advance in qualification for the work; do not, therefore, regard him as a foe for truthfully expressing his doubts; does not your own heart confess that his fears were not altogether groundless? Turn your deaf ear to what you judge to be his harsh criticism, and

endeavor to preach better.


Persons from love of change, from pique, from advance in their tastes, and other causes, may become uneasy under our ministry, and it is well for us to know nothing about it. Perceiving the danger, we must not betray our discovery, but bestir ourselves to improve our sermons, hoping that the good people will be better fed and forget their dissatisfaction. If they are truly gracious persons, the incipient evil will pass away, and no .real discontent will arise, or if it does you must not provoke it by suspecting it. Where I have known that there existed a measure of disaffection to myself, I have not recognized it, unless it has been forced upon me, but have, on the contrary, acted towards the opposing person with all the more courtesy and friendliness, and I have never heard any more of the matter. If I had treated the good man as an opponent, he would have done his best to take the part assigned him, and carry it out to his own credit; but I felt that he was a Christian man, and

had a right to dislike me if he thought fit, and that if he did so I ought not to think unkindly of him; and therefore. I treated him as one who was a friend to my Lord, if not to me, gave him some work to do which implied confidence in him, made him feel at home, and by degrees won him to be an attached friend as well as a fellow-worker.


The best of people are sometimes out at elbows and say unkind things; we should be glad if our friends could quite forget what we said when we were, peevish and irritable, and it will be Christlike to act towards others in this matter as we would wish them to do towards us. Never make a brother remember that he once uttered a hard speech in reference to yourself. If you see him in a happier mood, do not mention the former painful occasion: if he be a man of right spirit he will in future be unwilling to vex a pastor who has treated him so generously, and if he be a mere boor it is a pity to hold any argument with him, and therefore the past had better go by default.



It would be better to be deceived a hundred times than to live a life of suspicion. It is intolerable. The miser who traverses, his chamber at midnight and hears a burglar in every falling leaf is not more wretched than the minister who believes that plots are hatching against him, and that reports: to his disadvantage are being spread. I remember a brother who believed

that he was being poisoned, and was persuaded that even the seat he sat upon and the clothes he wore had by some subtle chemistry become saturated with death; his life was a perpetual scare, and such is the existence of a minister when he mistrusts all around him. Nor is suspicion merely a source of disquietude, it is a moral evil, and injures the character of the man who harbors it.


Suspicion in kings creates tyranny, in husbands jealousy, and in ministers bitterness; such bitterness as in spirit dissolves all the ties of the pastoral relation, eating like a corrosive acid into the very soul the office and making it a curse rather than a blessing. When once this terrible evil has curdled all the milk of human kindness in a man’s bosom, he becomes more fit for the detective police force than for the ministry; like a spider, he begins to cast out his lines, and fashions a web of tremulous threads, all of which lead up to himself and warn him of the least touch of even the tiniest midge. There he sits in the center, a mass of sensation, all nerves and raw wounds, excitable and excited, a self-immolated martyr drawing the blazing faggots about him, and apparently anxious to be burned. The most faithful friend is unsafe under such conditions. The most careful avoidance of offense will not secure immunity from mistrust, but will probably be construed into cunning anti cowardice. Society is almost as much in danger from a suspecting man as from a mad dog, for he snaps on all sides without reason, and scatters right and left the foam of his madness. It is vain to reason with the victim of this folly, for with perverse ingenuity he turns every argument the wrong way, and makes your plea for confidence another reason for mistrust. It is sad that he cannot see the iniquity of his groundless censure of others, especially of those who have been his best friends and the firmest upholders of the cause of Christ. “I would not wrong Virtue so tried by the least shade of doubt.


Undue suspicion is more abject baseness Even than the guilt suspected.” No one ought to be made an offender for a word; but, when suspicion rules, even silence becomes a crime. Brethren, shun this vice by renouncing the love of self. Judge it, to be a small matter what men think or Say of you, and care only for their treatment of your Lord. If you are naturally sensitive do not indulge the weakness, nor allow others to play upon it.


Would it not be a great degradation of your office if you were to keep an army of spies in your pay to collect information as to all that your people said of’ you? And yet it amounts to this if you allow certain busybodies to bring you all the gossip of the place, Drive the creatures away.


Abhor those mischief-making, tattling handmaidens of strife. Those who will fetch will carry and no doubt the gossips go from your house and report every observation which falls from your, lips, with plenty of garnishing of their own. Remember that, as the receiver is as bad as the thief, so the hearer of scandal is: a sharer in the guilt of it. If there were no listening ears there would be no talebearing tongues. While you are a buyer of ill wares the demand will create the supply, and the factories of falsehood will be working full time. No one wishes to become a creator of lies, and yet he who hears slanders with pleasure and believes them with readiness will hatch many a brood into active life. Solomon says; “a whisperer separateth chief friends.” (Prov. 16;28.)


Insinuations are thrown out, and jealousies aroused, till “mutual coolness ensues, and neither can understand why; each wonders what can possibly be the cause. Thus the firmest, the longest, the warmest, and most confiding attachments, the sources of life’s sweetest joys, are broken up perhaps for ever.” This is work worthy of the arch-fiend himself, but it could never be done if men lived out of the atmosphere of suspicion. As it is, the world is full of sorrow through this cause, a sorrow as sharp as it is superfluous, This is grievous indeed! Campbell eloquently remarks, “The ruins of old friendships are a more melancholy spectacle to me than those of desolated palaces. They exhibit the heart which was once lighted up with joy all damp and deserted, and haunted by those birds of ill omen that nestle in ruins.” O suspicion, what

desolations thou hast made in the earth!


Learn to disbelieve those who have no faith in their brethren. Suspect; those who would lead you to suspect others. A resolute unbelief in all the scandalmongers will do much to repress their mischievous energies.


Matthew Pool in his Cripplegate Lecture says, “Common fame hath lost its reputation long since, and I do not know anything which it hath done in our day to regain it; therefore it ought not to be credited. How few reports there are of any kind which, when they come to be examined, we do not find to be false! For my part, I reckon, if I believe one report in twenty, I make a very liberal allowance. Especially distrust reproaches and evil reports, because these spread fastest, as being grateful to most persons, who suppose their own reputation to be never so well grounded as when it is built upon the ruins of other men’s.” Because the persons who would render you mistrustful of your friends are a sorry set, and because suspicion is in itself a wretched and tormenting vice, resolve to turn towards the whole business your blind eye and your deaf ear.

Need I say a word or two about the wisdom of never hearing what was not meant for you. The caves-dropper is a mean person, very little if anything better than the common informer; and he who says he overheard may be considered to have heard over and above what he should have done.


Jeremy Taylor wisely and justly observes, “Never listen at the door or window, for besides that it listeners seldom hear any good of themselves. Listening is a sort of larceny, but the goods stolen contains in it a danger and a snare, it is also invading my neighbor’s privacy, and a laying that open, Which he therefore encloses that it might not be open?’ It is a well worn proverb that are never a pleasure to the thief. Information obtained by clandestine means must, in all but extreme cases, be more injury than benefit to a cause. The magistrate may judge it expedient to obtain evidence by such means, but I cannot imagine a case in which a minister should do so.


Ours is a mission of grace and peace; we are not prosecutors who search out condemnatory evidence, but friends whose love would cover a multitude of offenses. The peeping eyes of Canaan, the son of Ham, shall never be in our employ; we prefer the pious delicacy of Shem and Japhet, who went backward and covered the shame which the child of evil had published with glee. To opinions and remarks about yourself turn also as a general rule the blind eye and the deaf ear. Public men must expect public criticism, and as the public cannot be regarded as infallible, public men may expect to be criticized in a way which is neither fair nor pleasant. To all honest and just remarks we are bound to give due measure of heed, but to the bitter verdict of prejudice, the frivolous faultfinding of men of fashion, the stupid utterances of the ignorant, and

the fierce denunciations of opponents, we may very safely turn a deaf ear. We cannot expect those to approve of us; whom we condemn by our testimony against their favorite sins their commendation would show that we had missed our mark:. We naturally look to be approved by our own people, the members of our churches, and the adherents of our congregations, and when they make observations which show that they are not very great admirers, we may be tempted to discouragement if not to anger: herein lies a snare. When I was about to leave my village charge for London, one of the old men prayed that! might be “delivered from the bleating of the sheep.”


For the life of me I could not imagine what he meant, but the riddle is plain now, and I have learned to offer the prayer myself. Too much consideration of what is said by our people, whether it be in praise or in depreciation, is not good for us. If we dwell on high with “that great Shepherd of the sheep” we shall care little for all the confused bleatings around us, but if we become “carnal, and walk as men,” we shall have little rest if we listen to this, that, and the other which every poor sheep may bleat about us. Perhaps it is quite true that you were uncommonly dull last Sabbath morning, but there was no need that Mrs. Clack should come and tell you that Deacon Jones thought so. It is more than probable that having been out in the country all the previous week, your preaching was very like milk and water, but there can be no necessity for your going round among the people to discover whether they noticed it; or not. Is it not enough that your conscience is uneasy upon the point? Endeavor to improve for the future, but do not want to hear all that every Jack, Tom, and Mary may have to say about it. On the other hand, you were on the high horse in your last sermon, and finished with quite a flourish of trumpets, and you feel considerable anxiety to know what impression you produced, Repress your curiosity: it will do you no good to enquire. If the people should happen to agree with your verdict, it will only feed your pitiful vanity, and if they think otherwise your fishing for their praise will injure you in their esteem. In any case it is: all about yourself, and this is a poor theme to be anxious

about; play the man, and do not demean yourself by seeking compliments like little children when dressed in new clothes, who say, “See my pretty frock.”


Have you not by this time discovered that flattery is as injurious as it is pleasant? It softens the mind and makes you more sensitive to slander. In proportion as praise pleases you censure will pain you. Besides, it is a crime to be taken off from your great object of glorifying the Lord Jesus by petty considerations as to your little self, and, if there were no other reason, this ought to weigh much with you. Pride is a deadly sin, and will grow without your borrowing the parish water-cart to quicken it. Forget expressions which feed your vanity, and if you find yourself relishing the unwholesome morsels confess the sin with deep humiliation.


Payson showed that he was strong in the Lord when he wrote to his mother,” You must not, certainly, my dear mother, say one word which even looks like an intimation that you think me advancing in grace. I cannot bear it. All the people here, whether friends or enemies, conspire to ruin me. Satan and my own heart, of course, will lend a hand; and if you join too, I fear all the cold water which Christ can throw upon my pride will not prevent its breaking out into a destructive flame. As certainly as anybody flatters and caresses me my heavenly Father has to whip me: and an unspeakable mercy it is that he condescends to do it. I can, it is true, easily muster a hundred reasons why I should not be proud, but pride will not mind mason, nor anything else but a good drubbing. Even at this moment I feel it tingling in my fingers’ ends, and seeking to guide my pen,” Knowing something myself of those secret Whippings which our good Father administers to’ his servants when he sees them unduly exalted, I heartily add my own Solemn warnings against your pampering the flesh by listening to the praises of the kindest friends you have. They are injudicious, and you must beware of them.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/spurgeon-on-suspicion-in-ministry (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

My lecture on church planting and failure

Is now online here.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/my-lecture-on-church-planting-and-failure (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Spunky new logo, spunky new website

A bit of razzle dazzle over at the Geneva website: a new logo brings a new skin for the website.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/spunky-new-logo-spunky-new-website (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

God entrusted this difficult family situation to you

I was comforted and encouraged by this section in Driscoll’s 2012 Christmas sermon (at 31-32 minutes):



Will you love and lead the family God has given you, even if it’s not the one you envisioned? “Had I known that she would be like this, I would have not signed up for a lifetime. Had I known that the kids would be like this, I would not have signed up for a lifetime. Had I known that they would get sick, or I would get sick, had I known what their extended family would be like, had I known the sins in their past that have haunted us in the present, had I known that they would betray me in this way or fail me in this way, I never would have signed up for a lifetime of this.”


And Joseph says, “That’s fine. It’s going to be hard, but I trust the Lord, and his vision for my family is my vision for my family.” And let me say this—let me say this to you men. I feel inclined to the Holy Spirit to press this point home. If God should give some of you men a difficult family, it’s not a burden, it’s an honor because God has entrusted to you a great responsibility for the woman and children that he loves very dearly. And perhaps he didn’t give it to another man because he wasn’t sure that his daughter would be loved well and that his children would be raised well.







It applies as well to women as to men and I wanted to share it with those of my readers who are struggling with really difficult family situations.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/god-entrusted-this-difficult-family-situation-to-you (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Thoughts on the DiSC Profile 2: Thoughts on ‘D’


  1. D’s, oddly, often seem to act like S’s! That is, a D can often be clumsy in communication and fixated on familiar patterns of doing things and even sometimes anti-social in a way that might look introverted at times. But it’s for different reasons:

    • An S is clumsy in communication because they worry so MUCH about what’s going on and the right way to say stuff… the D is clumsy because they don’t worry AT ALL!

    • An S finds security in familiar patterns, feels comfortable in them and feels like they are a safer and predictable way to benefit others… whereas a D is so solipsistic that they often don’t realise they are stuck in a rut - they just haven’t asked other for input!

    • An S finds small talk in large crowds intense and overwhelming and prefers a small circle of close friends… a D finds small talk in large crowds tiresome and inefficient and prefers a small circle of henchmen.



  2. In Christian circles I move in, and in the last few decades of Australian education/organisational culture I think it is frowned upon to be a D. As a result, I think many people, especially those in Christian leadership, who would be more comfortable in a D-style leadership have been trained to ape an ‘i’ style leadership - they try to be more inspirational and collaborative than suits them. Better to help them be a loving and humble ‘D’, rather than keep trying to force them to become an ‘i’ or ‘S’.

  3. D’s feel deeply about being in control. They’re not argumentative because they’re rude, they genuinely feel passionately about where they’re going and feel stressed and attacked when that is questioned. Learning to take God very seriously and to not take themselves seriously is very important. Laughing at themselves is a very important step in enabling them to collaborate with others.

  4. Young D’s are some of the most difficult people to work with - they don’t have the discipline to get much done yet, they don’t have the patience to get the details right and they don’t have the people skills to motivate others. They are best used on ‘high risk, short-deadline, low—social-impact’ assignments that others would find scary.

  5. It might help non-D types to realise that a D actually feels emotionally stressed, depressed, and demotivated by lack of control, ineffeciency, slow pace, group work, routine activity. They’re not just abrasive and impatient. They actually thrive in change and challenge and feel exhausted by the lack of these things.


  6. The way to influence a D is to either:



    • Sow ideas, inception-style, and gradually let them think of them as their own.

    • Show them how they will make a larger impact with your ideas.

    • Don’t tell them what they ‘should’ do, or what is ‘right’ or why ‘other people are worried about you not doing it’. These will all make them angry.



  7. D’s can often be cagey and suspicious in the way they relate to other people. Rather than resenting this, you need to learn what gestures and patterns of behaviour will gain their trust and respect. Show you respect them and their autonomy. And don’t annoy them!






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/thoughts-on-the-disc-profile-2-thoughts-on-d (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

What counts for greatness?

One of our student leaders made this comment on our Facebook Page the other day:



Our society has a tendency to place ‘great men’ on pedestals, while ‘common man’ is seen to be potential unfulfilled. Fact is, though, I’ve been raised, taught, discipled and encouraged by ‘common men’, men who did not necessarily build nations, or megachurches or movements, but homes, families and communities. So who decides what counts for greatness?



Wise young man. I think of him as our resident druid.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/what-counts-for-greatness (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Ministry work hours 6: Contracts vs tenure

For senior ministry positions I’m in favour of tenure, rather than contracts.


For apprentices, support staff and junior staff I think contracts have their advantages, but I think there are some important reasons why employing staff on contracts that require renewal in keeping with job performance is problematic:



  1. It weights performance too heavily. Those who preach and teach need to build ministry over the long haul and not be measured to closely by their performance.

  2. It puts a major responsibility on the assessing body (the elders? a committee? the senior staff leader?) on assessing the performance of the staff rather than sitting under their spiritual oversight.

  3. It doesn’t protect the leader in enabling them to teach unpopular truths and lead through unpopular changes.

  4. It can produce a mercenary mindset in the staff themselves: ‘I’m just here for 3 years, after that is anyone’s guess’.

  5. It establishes the relationship between the leader and the congregation as someone who is here only temporarily to do a task, rather than someone who is here for the relationship.

  6. It is generally in the best interest of the church to have leaders there over a long period.


All of this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t review our senior staff and consider performance. It doesn’t mean we can’t think seriously about getting to a point where we might take steps towards encouraging a staff member to move on. It doesn’t mean staff themselves can’t resolve to move on after a season. But I just believe the emphasis shouldn’t be put on these factors. They should be hard to do, they should be done against the grain. But good leaders should still have the conviction to help unsuited leaders move on if need be.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/ministry-work-hours-6-contracts-vs-tenure (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Mirrors 7th June 2013


  1. Randy Pope of Perimeter Church planting fame recently spoke at Queensland Presbyterian Theological College on ‘Go and make disciples… how?’



  2. Is ‘being a radical disciple’ the new legalism? Could be:



    Today’s millennial generation is being fed the message that if they don’t do something extraordinary in this life they are wasting their gifts and potential. The sad result is that many young adults feel ashamed if they “settle” into ordinary jobs, get married early and start families, live in small towns, or as 1 Thessalonians 4:11 says, “aspire to live quietly, and to mind [their] affairs, and to work with [their] hands.” For too many millennials their greatest fear in this life is being an ordinary person with a non-glamorous job, living in the suburbs, and having nothing spectacular to boast about.









via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-7th-june-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Spurgeon on being cheerful in ministry


I love a minister whose face invites me to make him my friend - a man upon whose doorstep you read Salve, “Welcome”; and feel that there is no need of that Pompeian warning, Cave Canem, “Beware of the dog.” Give me the man around whom children come, like flies around a honeypot: they are first-class judges of a good man…. So you will find that children have their instincts, and discover very speedily who is their friend; and depend upon it the children’s friend is one who will be worth knowing….


A man who has no geniality about him had better be an undertaker and bury the dead, for he will never succeed in influencing the living…. A man must have a great heart if he would have a great congregation. His heart should be as capacious as those noble harbours along our coast, which contain sea room for a fleet. When a man has a large, loving heart, men go to him as ships to a haven, and feel at peace when they have anchored under the lee of his friendship. Such a man is hearty in private as well as in public; his blood is not cold and fishy, but he is warm as your own fireside. No pride and selfishness chill you when you approach him; he has his doors all open to receive you, and you are at home wit him at once. Such men I would persuade you to be, every one of you.


The Christian minister should also be very cheerful. I don’t believe in going about like certain monks whom I saw in Rome, who salute each other in sepulchral tones, and convey the pleasant informaiton “Brother, we must die”; to which lively salutation each lively brother of the order replies, “Yes, brother, we must die.” I was glad to be assured upon such good authority that all these lazy fellows are about to die; upon the whole, it is about the best thing they can do; but till that event occurs, they might use some more comfortable form of salutation.


.... Some of the biggest rogues in the world have been as mortified in appearance as if they had lived on locusts and wild honey. It is a very vulgar error to suppose that a melancholy countenance is the index of a gracious heart. I commend cheerfulness to all who would win souls; not levity and frothiness, but a genial, happy spirit. There are more flies caught with honey than with vinegar, and there will be more souls led to heaven by a man who wears heaven in his face than by one who bears Tartarus in his looks.


(Lectures to my Students on Preaching)







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/spurgeon-on-being-cheerful-in-ministry (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Thoughts on the DiSC Profile 1: Thoughts on ‘S’

We use the DiSC profile with out staff team.* I’m a high D, high i, with a fair bit of C and hardly any S. It’s really helpful. And because it is simple and behaviour-oriented, it’s easier to process, in my experience that the EYUT, GHTJ, ABCD Myers-Briggs thingo. Better to have a slightly simplistic, Mickey-Mouse tool that’s easy to use, than a highly accurate and hard to remember tool, in my opinion.


Anyways, I thought I’d share some random bits and pieces about the DiSC profile. Some of this is observations I have picked up that I haven’t read so explicitly in the typical profile descriptions. Please don’t be offended if some of my observations might seem critical of your personality type. I assure you that I will be just as critical of the other types - including mine!


Some observations on S:



  1. S loves familiar routines and rhythms. If you can give a familiar routine and rhythm you will get more out of them.

  2. But in this, S types can find it hard to thing outside that routine. If criticised they will defend the familiar. They will tend to present evaluations within the bounds of the familiar.

  3. S people can seem details-oriented but often it’s in the sense of a hobbyist or a specialist, rather than seeing everything globally and analytically as a C type might. They may even completely discount facts and ideas for personal/intuitive reasons. As a result, beware of putting too much trust in their reports and systems.

  4. S people, while highly relational, are relational in an introverted, holding things close, feeling things deeply kind of way. As a result sometimes they can come across quite clumsy - or even harsh - in personal interactions because they have over-thought stuff so much first!

  5. The less comfortable with something an S it seems like the less it fully exists in their world. Giving an S a task they are not familiar with will probably lead to vague or non-existent reporting and lack of urgency.

  6. In a big way, caring for the people they care about is caring for them and motivating for them.

  7. Because S types are so relational they are often hopeless with task-oriented communication - like SMS and email. Frustratingly vague, curt, muddled. But they are masters at social media - S types makes the best bloggers and Facebookers, if they can handle the negative comments!

  8. It is so important to raise ideas, plans, and especially criticisms with them early, and then give them time to think and process and feel through it all - and then invite them to share their thoughts, worries and feelings.

  9. If you want to motivate an S, don’t give them more information and inspiration. Instead draw close to them. I’ve been amazed how investing in the personal life of S type personalities ends up re-energising them with work, helping them feel focussed, confident and empowered.


*You can purchase it here - we used the Workplace Profile. You can also take a free one here.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/thoughts-on-the-disc-profile-1-thoughts-on-s (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Ministry work hours 5: Outcome vs hours

Hours works (and leave taken) are inaccurate measures. They focus on physical presence, rather than work done. Sometimes physical presences is a crucial part of a job. Sometimes it is a secondary but still valuable thing. It is always one measure of work. But you can be physically present and not working. Or working badly. Or working inefficiently.


Even worse, even to the extent that hours worked measures work done, it is measuring activity rather than outcome.


Someone can work a 60 hour week and produce little gain for the kingdom - dithering in a million little projects, crawling through unnecessarily detailed sermon preparation, meeting every single pastoral need, sitting on badly chaired committees and fussing about bullet points on powerpoint. Another person can sometimes work a 40 hour week and write a better sermon, train more people for ministry and invest in key new ministry initiatives.


I’m not too fussed how many hours my staff work, or how much leave they take - as long as they get the job done.


I tend to only drill down to tracking hours and counting leave when someone doesn’t seem to be getting the job done. Partly it helps me to hold them accountable. Partly it helps THEM to build in some basic disciplines around time management.


Sometimes I wonder if we focus on hours worked because we’ve never done the hard work of figuring out what outcomes we actually want. That requires too much hard thinking and clarifying. Easier just to cram up our lives with busyness. We feel godly because we feel exhausted. And others admire us because we are so frantic. But we are making little objective gain for the cause of the gospel.


Now this can be taken too far, where someone can be ruthlessly pragmatic, and produce thin or loveless results. And not be present enough to add the extra value that deeper relationships and engagement can bring. But then you can build in some basic expectations into the job description - and even better, employ the right kind of people!






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/ministry-work-hours-5-outcome-vs-hours (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Baz Lurhmann on Great Gatsby, materialism and meaning

I love the book and I’m a believer in the movie. Nikki and I are going to see it on Saturday.


I reckon Baz is a great director. I really loved Strictly Ballroom and Romeo + Juliet. And Moulin Rouge was an ordinary film with some great songs and visuals. Australia. Well. Let’s pretend that never happened. But I reckon Gatsby will be great. It give me heart that David Stratton liked it. I’m more of a David man than a Margaret man.


I heard this fairly brief interview with Baz on Triple J yesterday. I love his voice and his humour and manner. Good times. The interview itself it typical Triple J fluff. But this quote at the end is brilliant:



It speaks about who we are where we are.

Look:

Is there a lot of razzle dazzle that be people go on? Yes.

Are there parties? Fantastic.

Can you dress up? Go for it.

But at the end there’s a contemplation. There are basically four characters in a room, five characters in a room, saying ‘But you love him?’ and it ends with a devastated young man going: ‘Materialism cannot be the focus of your life. It might be nice to have a good suit and go to a great party, drink a few cocktails… but you gotta have a purpose and you’ve gotta have a cause. And that’s what he learns from Jay Gatsby: have a point to your life.



(listen here from 11:56-12:39)






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/baz-lurhmann-on-great-gatsby-materialism-and-meaning (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Quotes about Death 3: Jean-Paul Sartre

From the short story The Wall:



At that moment I felt that I had my whole life in front of me and Ithought, “It’s a damned lie.” It was worth nothing because it was finished. I wondered how I’d been able to walk, to laugh with the girls: I wouldn’t have moved so much as my little finger if I had only imagined I would die like this. My life was in front of me,shut, closed, like a bag and yet everything inside of it was unfinished. For an instant I tried to judge it. I wanted to tell myself, this is a beautiful life. But I couldn’t pass judgment on it; it was only a sketch; I had spent my time counterfeiting eternity, I had understood nothing. I missed nothing: there were so many things I could have missed,the taste of manzanilla or the baths I took in summerin a little creek near Cadiz; but death had disenchanted everything. ....


Tom was alone too but not in the same way. Sitting cross‐legged, he had begun to stare at the bench with a sort of smile, he looked amazed. He put out his hand and touched the wood cautiously asif he were afraid of breaking something,then drew back his hand quickly and shuddered. If I had been Tom I wouldn’t have amused myself by touching the bench; this was some more Irish nonsense, but I too found that objects had a funny look; they were more obliterated, less dense than usual. It was enough for me to look at the bench, the lamp, the pile of coal dust to feel that I was going to die. Naturally I couldn’t think clearly about my death but I saw in the way things fell back and kept their distance, discreetly, as people who speak quietly at the bedside of a dying man. It was his death which Tom has just touched on the bench.


In the state I wasin, ifsomeone had come and toldme I could go home quietly, that they would leave my life whole, it would have left me cold: several hours or several years of waiting is all the same when you have lost the illusion of being eternal. I clung to nothing, in a way I was calm. But it was a horrible calm - because of my; my body, I saw with its eyes, I heard with its ears, but it was no longer me; it sweated and trembled by itself and I didn’t recognize it anymore. I had to touch it and look at it to find out what was happening, as if it were the body of someone else. At times I could still feel it, I felt sinkings, and fallings, as when you’re in a plane taking a nose dive, or I felt my heart beating. But that didn’t reassure me. Everything that came from my body was all cockeyed. Most of the time it was quiet and I felt no more than a sort of weight, a filthy presence against me; I had the impression of being tied to an enormous ermin.Once I felt my pants and I felt they were damp; I didn’t know whether it was sweat or urine, but I went to piss on the coal pile as a precaution.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/quotes-about-death-3-jean-paul-sartre (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Church Community Builder Implementation Journal Part 8: Implementation pace

It is important to come up with some kind of basic roll-out plan, for something like this. And better to do it slower and steadier than you think. People feel unsettled by fast new changes: give them time to get used to it. There will inevitably be bugs, so better to fix them with a smaller group of people affected. After you’ve spent ages getting your head around the software, the different features are all obvious, but it is too confusing to give them all at once to someone cold.


I recommend planning a communication schedule, where you will talk about the introduction of the Church Community Builder, why you are introducing it, how you are introducing it and so on. This should be done through emails, announcements and even in leadership meetings.


And then gradually roll it out, talking about what you are going to do, before you do it, step by step by step. Baby steps like:



  1. Get leaders to log in and update a photo and adjust their privacy and communication settings: 2-3 weeks

  2. Start using it for broadcast emails: 2-3 weeks


It might seem annoyingly slow. But each step will be more fully understood, more widely adopted and more effectively implemented.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/church-community-builder-implementation-journal-part-8-implementation-pace (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Ministry work hours 4: The lay leader works a 40 hour week plus 10 hours for church?

Although I probably end up at a similar conclusion, I think the logic of this common maths equation is unhelpful:



The committed church member works in their job for 40-50 hours and then works 10-15 hours for church. The minister should do at least the same amount.



I think it is unhelpful because it introduces a whole bunch of categories for thinking about ministry work: that it has to be ‘fair’ compared to a lay leader, that it is about ‘duty’ vs ‘free service’. I don’t think this perspectives are especially constructive for the mindset of the paid minister or for the lay leaders.


Moreover, I think it is misleading because the kind of work and work hours are incommensurate. School teachers get big holidays. But a mate of mine who’s a school teacher commonly responds to those who complain about this: “Well why don’t you become a teacher then?” :-)


Here are a couple of ways that the lay leaders’ 10 hours overtime for church doesn’t quite match the paid minister’s 10 hours:



  1. For the lay leader, this work is a recreational and social break: finally getting to see church friends and do something that matters. For the minister this is more of their day job.

  2. For the lay leader, even if it is harder stuff (doing finances for church, sitting on an elders board), there is the satisfaction of doing something that makes a lasting, eternal difference.

  3. For the lay leader, church social function can be purely an enjoyable occasional, for the ministry leader even the most pleasant church social occasion has a dimension of ‘work’ to it.

  4. For the lay leader, they have the free choice to invest this discretionary time with church - shouldn’t a paid minister have similar discretion to perhaps give this time to a range of causes: The Australian Kendo Renmei, political lobbying, the parent-teacher association, writing the Great Australian Novel, involvement in some parachurch ministry?


This list might not be complete, nor completely true for every paid minister or lay leader, every paid ministry or lay leadership position. But it is an example of why trying to do work out a simple analogy just doesn’t work. I suppose you could spend time and effort trying to find the closest possible analogy and get some benefit from this process. But largely I think it is a red herring, that will be both inaccurate in terms of thinking about the work and psychologically unhealthy for everyone involved.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/ministry-work-hours-4-the-lay-leader-works-a-40-hour-week-plus-10-hours-for (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Mirrors 25th May 2013


  1. Why Shiloh likes the idea of homeschooling.

  2. When meeting with a team member, make sure you regularly ask, ‘Is there anything else you’d like to talk about?’, suggests Dave Moore. I love the Manager Tools suggestion that the first 15 minutes of every such meeting should be focussed on just that question.

  3. How respectful is your Facebooking about your little kids? Will they be hurt by your comments when they are older?:
    Parents, before you post about your small children, imagine a 13-year-old version of them reading over your shoulder. Your child bears the image of God just as you do. Does what you communicate honor them as equal image-bearers? Does it provide short-term gratification for you or honor long-term relationship with them? Does it potentially expose them to ridicule or label them? Does it record a negative sentiment that an adult would recognize as fleeting but an adolescent might not?


  4. The legacy of Keith Green. I loved that book ‘No Compromise’, but I must admit, I could never get into his Billy Joel sort of music. I could never get into Billy Joel either.

  5. Ed Stetzer reminds us that the horror story of the Cleveland sex slavery kidnappings gets repeated millions of times the world over, through the sex trade.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-25th-may-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Quotes about Death 2: Hamlet


To be, or not to be, that is the question:

Whether ‘tis Nobler in the mind to suffer

The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune,

Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles,

And by opposing end them: to die, to sleep

No more; and by a sleep, to say we end

The Heart-ache, and the thousand Natural shocks

That Flesh is heir to? ‘Tis a consummation

Devoutly to be wished. To die to sleep,

To sleep, perchance to Dream; Aye, there’s the rub,

For in that sleep of death, what dreams may come,

When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,

Must give us pause. There’s the respect

That makes Calamity of so long life:

For who would bear the Whips and Scorns of time,

The Oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s Contumely,

The pangs of disprized Love, the Law’s delay,

The insolence of Office, and the Spurns

That patient merit of the unworthy takes,

When he himself might his Quietus make

With a bare Bodkin? Who would Fardels bear,

To grunt and sweat under a weary life,

But that the dread of something after death,

The undiscovered Country, from whose bourn

No Traveller returns, Puzzles the will,

And makes us rather bear those ills we have,

Than fly to others that we know not of.

Thus Conscience does make Cowards of us all,

And thus the Native hue of Resolution

Is sicklied o’er, with the pale cast of Thought,

And enterprises of great pith and moment,

With this regard their Currents turn awry,

And lose the name of Action.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/quotes-about-death-2-hamlet (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

The internet is not the problem, you are the problem

I find doom and gloom pieces about how social media kills community and learning and small puppies annoying. There are new risks that the internet brings. But it’s silly and simplistic to invest the internet with these unique and disastrous powers.


Paul Miller spent a year offline. And this was his discovery:



As it turned out, a dozen letters a week could prove to be as overwhelming as a hundred emails a day. And that was the way it went in most aspects of my life. A good book took motivation to read, whether I had the internet as an alternative or not. Leaving the house to hang out with people took just as much courage as it ever did.


By late 2012, I’d learned how to make a new style of wrong choices off the internet. I abandoned my positive offline habits, and discovered new offline vices. Instead of taking boredom and lack of stimulation and turning them into learning and creativity, I turned toward passive consumption and social retreat.


A year in, I don’t ride my bike so much. My frisbee gathers dust. Most weeks I don’t go out with people even once. My favorite place is the couch. I prop my feet up on the coffee table, play a video game, and listen to an audiobook. I pick a mindless game, like Borderlands 2 or Skate 3, and absently thumb the sticks through the game-world while my mind rests on the audiobook, or maybe just on nothing.



Tim Challies reflects:



It has long fascinated me that our technologies don’t do anything to us that we don’t want. We can say we hate the Internet or email or cell phones, but if we hated them as much as we insist, we’d do something about them. We may hate them, but we love them just a little bit more.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/the-internet-is-not-the-problem-you-are-the-problem (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Quotes about Death 1: Julian Barnes

From his great little book, Metroland:



There were a few private things which I didn’t confide to Toni. Actually, only one: the thing about dying. We always laughed about it, except on the rare occasions when we knew the person involved. Lucas, for instance, wing-forward int eh Thirds, was found one morning by his mother, gassed. But even then, we were more interested in the rumours than in the fact of his death. A girl friend? The family way? Unable to face the parents?

There must, I suppose have been some causal connection between the arrival in my head of the fear of the Big D, and the departure of God; but if so, it was a loose exchange, with no formal process of reasoning present. God, who had turned up in my life a decade earlier without proof or argument, got the boot for a number of reaosns, none of which, I suspect will seem wholly sufficient: the boringness of Sundays, the creeps who took it all seriously at school, Buadelaire and Rimbaud, the pleasure of blasphemy (dangerous, this one), humn-singing and organ music and the language of prayer, inability any longer to think of wanking as a sin, and - as a clincher - an unwillingness to believe that dead realtives were watching what I was doing.

So, the whole package had to go, though its loss diminished neither the boringness of Sundays nor the guilt of wanking. Within weeks, however, as if to punish me, the infrequent but paralysing horror of Big D invaded my life. I don’t claim any originality for the timing and location of my bouts of fear (when in bed, unable to sleep), but I do claim one touch of particularity. The fear of death would always arrive while I was lying on my right side, facing towards the window and the distant railway line. It would never come when I was on my left side, facing my bookshelves and the rest of the house. ONce sarted, the fear could not be diminished by simply turning over: it had to be played out to the end. To this day I have a preference for sleeping on my left side.

What was the fear life? Is t different for other people? I don’t know. A sudden, rising terror which takes you unawares; a surging need to scream, which the house rules forbid (they always do), so that you lie there with your mouth open in a trembling panic; total wakefulness, which takes an hour or so to subside; and all this as background to and symptom of the central image, part-visual, part-intellectual, of non-existence. A picture of endlessly retreating stars, taken I expect - with the crass bathos of the unconscious - from the opening credits of a Universal Pictures film; a sensation of total aloneness within your pyjamaed, shaking body; a realisation of Time (always capitalised) going on without you for ever and ever; and a persecuted sense of having been trapped into the present situation by person or persons unknown.

The fear of dying meant, of course, not the fear of dying but the fear of being dead. Few fallacies depressed me more than the line: ‘I don’t mind being dead; it’s just like being asleep. Its the dying I can’t face.’ Nothing seemed clearer to me in my nocturnal terrors than that death bore no resemblance to sleep. I wouldn’t mind Dying at all, I thought, as long as I didn’t end up Dead at the end of it.







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/quotes-about-death-1-julian-barnes (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

You should go and work with my mate Dan

Dan Godden has become a good friend of mine over the last few years. We really got to know each other during a junket to the USA in 2011. It turns out that when you order a ‘double room’ in the US it means ‘double bed’... you get to know someone well when you have hotel check in clerks thinking you’re a gay couple, and when you have to drive on the right side of the road in a foreign city while jet lagged.


ANYWAY. It’s really exciting what God is doing through Dan and his team in the Salt Church church plant in Wollongong. I can say that it would be a great ministry to be a part of and Dan would be a great guy to work with.


Maybe you should apply? (Eccles 11:1-6)






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/you-should-go-and-work-with-my-mate-dan (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Ministry work hours 2: Stipend not salary

Ministry is not best talked about in hours-worked at all really.


Ministry payment is not a wage paid on a per hour basis or a salary for a full-time or part-time job. Not really.


Better to think of ministry payment as a stipend to free someone up for the task. Any particular tasks, duties, meetings, hours that might give some form to this are very much secondary.


You are paid to be freed up to be you. You are paid to be freed up to fulfil a role. Particular tasks or particular hours are a sometimes necessary and very inadequate proxy for this.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/ministry-work-hours-2-stipend-not-salary (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Mirrors 11th May 2013


  1. The Briefing’s latest critique of Hillsong Conference. Note the positive observations of the workshops:
    Off that main platform, however, my constant impression was that everyone involved was keen to be shaped by how God has revealed himself in his word, and to align their ministry and understanding of church to that. For sure, they came up with conclusions that at times I disagreed with, but the principle of carefully reading Scripture and forming how you act on that foundation was both clearly in place, and widespread.

    I was surprised at home positive they were about the lyrics of ‘Beneath The Waters’ and other such songs. I was disappointed with how ordinary the lyrics of these songs are. They have a lot more atonement terminology, but it seems sort of jumbled together, like it’s been pulled out of a scrabble bag (This is my revelation, Christ Jesus crucified, Salvation through repentance At the cross on which He died[?! What does this even mean?])... but good that they are seeing the good and acknowledging it, even while giving a pretty harsh critique!

  2. A cute little image from Challies about why he always turns around to look at the groom’s face when a bride walks into the church building:
    Now here’s the tip: When those doors open, steal a quick glance at the groom. I know the bride is the star of the show and you don’t want to miss her, but it’s okay to look to the front of the church for just a moment. The more I read and understand Ephesians 5:22-33 and the more I come to grasp the deepest meaning of marriage, the more I find myself not wanting to miss what happens at the front of the room. Because in that moment the groom is just a small picture, a dim reflection, of the love Jesus Christ has for his bride, the church. There is nothing quite like the expression on a groom’s face when his bride appears before him. There is joy there. There is delight and desire and such love. There is the knowledge that his longing for a bride is being fulfilled and that she will soon be his, that in just moments they will be united together forever.


  3. A silly-but-cool AFES fundraising drive. Fundraising drives are good gimmicks, but must never be the heart of our fundraising strategies in gospel ministry. Because we are not FUNDRAISING, we are not MERCHANDISING, we are raising up GOSPEL PARTNERS. However, as one minor strategy amongst many, things like this can be great - and a fun entry point for genuine gospel partnerships.

  4. A great new MTS blog post about adjusting to ministry as work.

  5. Joe shares the speech Tasmanian MP Jacqui Petrusma gave for why she opposed the recent abortion bill.

  6. Dove has recently done some excellent commercials. It’s quite touching to see these women realise that others see them as much more beautiful than they see themselves… and that the perception of others are more accurate! The three minute version The six minute version






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/mirrors-11th-may-2013 (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Bring a printer and a power board to conferences

A handy little bit of advice I learned from working with Alan Reader was: always bring a printer, paper and a power-board to conferences you are organising. They always come in mega-handy.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://genevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/bring-a-printer-and-a-power-board-to-conferences (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Spurgeon on being cheerful in ministry


I love a minister whose face invites me to make him my friend - a man upon whose doorstep you read Salve, “Welcome”; and feel that there is no need of that Pompeian warning, Cave Canem, “Beware of the dog.” Give me the man around whom children come, like flies around a honeypot: they are first-class judges of a good man…. So you will find that children have their instincts, and discover very speedily who is their friend; and depend upon it the children’s friend is one who will be worth knowing….


A man who has no geniality about him had better be an undertaker and bury the dead, for he will never succeed in influencing the living…. A man must have a great heart if he would have a great congregation. His heart should be as capacious as those noble harbours along our coast, which contain sea room for a fleet. When a man has a large, loving heart, men go to him as ships to a haven, and feel at peace when they have anchored under the lee of his friendship. Such a man is hearty in private as well as in public; his blood is not cold and fishy, but he is warm as your own fireside. No pride and selfishness chill you when you approach him; he has his doors all open to receive you, and you are at home wit him at once. Such men I would persuade you to be, every one of you.


The Christian minister should also be very cheerful. I don’t believe in going about like certain monks whom I saw in Rome, who salute each other in sepulchral tones, and convey the pleasant informaiton “Brother, we must die”; to which lively salutation each lively brother of the order replies, “Yes, brother, we must die.” I was glad to be assured upon such good authority that all these lazy fellows are about to die; upon the whole, it is about the best thing they can do; but till that event occurs, they might use some more comfortable form of salutation.


.... Some of the biggest rogues in the world have been as mortified in appearance as if they had lived on locusts and wild honey. It is a very vulgar error to suppose that a melancholy countenance is the index of a gracious heart. I commend cheerfulness to all who would win souls; not levity and frothiness, but a genial, happy spirit. There are more flies caught with honey than with vinegar, and there will be more souls led to heaven by a man who wears heaven in his face than by one who bears Tartarus in his looks.


(Lectures to my Students on Preaching)







via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/spurgeon-on-being-cheerful-in-ministry (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Thoughts on the DiSC Profile 1: Thoughts on ‘S’

We use the DiSC profile with out staff team.* I’m a high D, high i, with a fair bit of C and hardly any S. It’s really helpful. And because it is simple and behaviour-oriented, it’s easier to process, in my experience that the EYUT, GHTJ, ABCD Myers-Briggs thingo. Better to have a slightly simplistic, Mickey-Mouse tool that’s easy to use, than a highly accurate and hard to remember tool, in my opinion.


Anyways, I thought I’d share some random bits and pieces about the DiSC profile. Some of this is observations I have picked up that I haven’t read so explicitly in the typical profile descriptions. Please don’t be offended if some of my observations might seem critical of your personality type. I assure you that I will be just as critical of the other types - including mine! Rather, the intention is to


Some observations on S:



  1. S loves familiar routines and rhythms. If you can give a familiar routine and rhythm you will get more out of them.

  2. But in this, S types can find it hard to thing outside that routine. If criticised they will defend the familiar. They will tend to present evaluations within the bounds of the familiar.

  3. S people can seem details-oriented but often it’s in the sense of a hobbyist or a specialist, rather than seeing everything globally and analytically as a C type might. They may even completely discount facts and ideas for personal/intuitive reasons. As a result, beware of putting too much trust in their reports and systems.

  4. S people, while highly relational, are relational in an introverted, holding things close, feeling things deeply kind of way. As a result sometimes they can come across quite clumsy - or even harsh - in personal interactions because they have over-thought stuff so much first!

  5. The less comfortable with something an S it seems like the less it fully exists in their world. Giving an S a task they are not familiar with will probably lead to vague or non-existent reporting and lack of urgency.

  6. In a big way, caring for the people they care about is caring for them and motivating for them.

  7. Because S types are so relational they are often hopeless with task-oriented communication - like SMS and email. Frustratingly vague, curt, muddled. But they are masters at social media - S types makes the best bloggers and Facebookers, if they can handle the negative comments!

  8. It is so important to raise ideas, plans, and especially criticisms with them early, and then give them time to think and process and feel through it all - and then invite them to share their thoughts, worries and feelings.

  9. If you want to motivate an S, don’t give them more information and inspiration. Instead draw close to them. I’ve been amazed how investing in the personal life of S type personalities ends up re-energising them with work, helping them feel focussed, confident and empowered.


*You can purchase it here - we used the Workplace Profile. You can also take a free one here.






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/thoughts-on-the-disc-profile-1-thoughts-on-s (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)

Ministry work hours 5: Outcome vs hours

Hours works (and leave taken) are inaccurate measures. They focus on physical presence, rather than work done. Sometimes physical presences is a crucial part of a job. Sometimes it is a secondary but still valuable thing. It is always one measure of work. But you can be physically present and not working. Or working badly. Or working inefficiently.


Even worse, even to the extent that hours worked measures work done, it is measuring activity rather than outcome.


Someone can work a 60 hour week and produce little gain for the kingdom - dithering in a million little projects, crawling through unnecessarily detailed sermon preparation, meeting every single pastoral need, sitting on badly chaired committees and fussing about bullet points on powerpoint. Another person can sometimes work a 40 hour week and write a better sermon, train more people for ministry and invest in key new ministry initiatives.


I’m not too fussed how many hours my staff work, or how much leave they take - as long as they get the job done.


I tend to only drill down to tracking hours and counting leave when someone doesn’t seem to be getting the job done. Partly it helps me to hold them accountable. Partly it helps THEM to build in some basic disciplines around time management.


Sometimes I wonder if we focus on hours worked because we’ve never done the hard work of figuring out what outcomes we actually want. That requires too much hard thinking and clarifying. Easier just to cram up our lives with busyness. We feel godly because we feel exhausted. And others admire us because we are so frantic. But we are making little objective gain for the cause of the gospel.


Now this can be taken too far, where someone can be ruthlessly pragmatic, and produce thin or loveless results. And not be present enough to add the extra value that deeper relationships and engagement can bring. But then you can build in some basic expectations into the job description - and even better, employ the right kind of people!






via Blog - Christian Reflections http://thegenevapush.com/blogs/xian_reflections/ministry-work-hours-5-outcome-vs-hours (NB: to comment go to thegenevapush.com/xian_reflections)